/Prepared for Savor Health
SAVOR HEALTH × INNOVATIVE LABS

A new horizon for Ina®.
Dialysis, in focus.

A potential growth vertical for Savor Health’s intelligent nutrition assistant. Built for Susan and her team to explore 1,210 facilities, identify partner organizations and shape an evidence-generating pilot.

Prepared November 7, 2026

A starting point for partnership discovery.

THE OPPORTUNITY

Explore how Ina’s 24/7 SMS nutrition support could extend renal dietitians’ reach between treatments.

THE APPROACH

Start with New York operators near Savor Health’s headquarters. Validate clinical fit, workflow and willingness to pay.

THE EVIDENCE

Design a pilot around engagement, nutrition outcomes and a credible comparison.

Research pool ↗
1,210facilities
At least one criterion met
High priority ↗
651facilities
Both a reduction and 1–3 stars
QIP payment reduction ↗
828facilities
Reduction greater than 0%
Quality-of-care rating ↗
1,033facilities
Rated 1, 2 or 3 stars
Reported patients ↗
69,651patients
Year-end population · Dec 2024
Patient counts available for 1,136 of 1,210 facilities; 74 unavailable.High-priority group: 42,798 reported patients.
EXPLORE THE LANDSCAPE

Facility explorer

Loading facilities…
Both criteria One criterion
Scroll to zoom · drag to pan · select a marker
Locating facilities…◎ Address matches & labeled ZIP approximations
i

A research starting point, not a clinical conclusion. High priority means both selection criteria are met. Scores and ratings alone do not establish nutrition needs, purchase intent or demand for outside support.

PILOT DISCOVERY · NEW YORK FIRST

Facility directory

Facility / operatorLocationNetworkPatients Dec 2024QIP score ⓘReductionStarsPriority
DATA NOTES

A partnership research briefing.

Built by Innovative Labs for Susan and the Savor Health team to explore a potential ESRD / dialysis vertical for Ina. It supports market discovery and pilot planning; it does not establish clinical suitability or expected quality improvements.

This dashboard visualizes the 1,210-facility research pool in the Dialysis Facility Priority List, enriched by the supplied CMS facility and QIP files using six-digit CMS Certification Numbers (CCNs).

Population
The source analysis identifies 1,516 non-LDO-proxy facilities. Of these, 1,210 meet at least one criterion; 651 meet both, 177 have a reduction only and 382 have a low star rating only.
Non-LDO proxy
The source excludes DaVita, Fresenius Medical Care and US Renal Care, Inc. This is an operator-based proxy, not a CMS-published LDO flag. Non-LDO does not mean independently owned. Verify ownership before outreach.
Priority
High priority: payment reduction >0% AND quality-of-patient-care rating of 1–3 stars. Secondary: only one criterion is confirmed. Missing values remain unknown.
QIP score vs. reduction
Total Performance Score is on a 0–100 scale; higher is better. Payment reduction is a separate percentage. Missing or unavailable scores are never replaced by zero.
Stars and reporting periods
Stars are quality-of-patient-care ratings, not patient-experience ratings. The facility file supplies its own date ranges, shown in each detail panel. TPS.csv does not identify the QIP payment year. The two sources may cover different periods. Preparation date is not a CMS release date.
Reported patient population
Patient counts come from the CMS FY2026 Dialysis Facility Report public-use data, Table 1a (Measure_ID pahy4_f): patients treated at year-end, December 31, 2024. This is a historical population indicator for market sizing, not an estimate of today’s active census, annual patient throughput or Ina-eligible demand. Counts cover all dialysis modalities under the source’s assignment rules.
Patient coverage and totals
Exact six-digit primary-CCN joins provide counts for 1,136 of 1,210 facilities (93.9%); 74 are unavailable and excluded from totals. A missing match is not zero and does not establish a reason for missingness. No values are imputed from stations or quality-measure denominators. Totals update with filters and sum each matched CMS report once. The high-priority group has counts for 633 of 651 facilities, totaling 42,798.
Reports with additional CCNs
129 matched reports list additional CCNs. The associated CCNs are shown in the facility’s source details; the reported count is not allocated among those CCNs. No report has more than one CCN in the dashboard’s roster, so these reports are counted once. The sum is a report-level population indicator, not a newly deduplicated patient registry. Alternate-CCN-only matches are not substituted for a facility-specific count. Confirm current counts and ownership with the operator before pilot sizing.
Map locations
1,062 facilities were matched by the Census address geocoder. The remaining 148 use approximate GeoNames ZIP centroids. These appear as outlined markers and are explicitly labeled. Address matches are geocoded estimates, not surveyed coordinates. Overlapping markers open a facility selector.
Regional focus
Default order places New York facilities first for pilot discovery near Savor Health’s headquarters. Within New York, facilities meeting both criteria come first; other jurisdictions follow with both-criteria facilities first. Ties use higher reductions, then lower star ratings, facility name and CCN. This changes the order, not the nationwide research pool. The state filter lists New York first; selecting a state narrows the map, directory and totals. Other sort options override the default pilot order.
Ina product context
Savor Health describes Ina® as an intelligent nutrition assistant available by SMS around the clock. Dialysis use here is a proposed opportunity for clinical and commercial validation, not an assertion of dialysis-specific efficacy.
Sources
Dialysis_Facility_Priority_List.xlsx; CMS_Non_LDO_QIP_Stars_Network_State_Analysis.xlsx; DFC_FACILITY_2(1).csv; TPS.csv. Patient counts: CMS Medicare Dialysis Facilities, FY2026, DFR methodology guide and FY2026 data dictionary. Retrieved November 7, 2026. Public address geocoding: U.S. Census Bureau. ZIP centroids: GeoNames (CC BY 4.0). Map: us-atlas / U.S. Census boundaries.
Use and limitations
This is a static research snapshot prepared November 7, 2026. It does not automatically refresh. QIP reductions and star ratings do not identify why performance occurred or establish a facility’s need for commercial services.